The Drawbacks of a Conversational Relationship with God

So I started reading chapter 2 and forgot to blog the final question for chapter 1 after getting over bronchitis, so here it is:

"What might be the drawbacks of having a conversational relationship with God?"

So be honest, there are a ton. Mainly though dealing with our access to God himself. In the Old Testament, from a glance it looks like God had a formulaic relationship with his people. It's not true, but it can be easy to deduce that if just looking at the actions of the people. Do something wrong, kill an animal, and then you're all right with God. Sin, sacrifice, forgiveness, good relationship with God. It seems so simple. And so easy to maintain a good relationship with God. If I follow the easy, laid out, time-tested formula, I'll always have access to the Creator and he will always guide me. In so many ways we latch onto the same view now. Do something wrong, ask for forgiveness from Jesus, and then you're all right with God. True grace has taken a back seat to a parlor trick, a small illusion that wipes away our sins and keeps the status quo. This simple formula keeps our faith lives in a perpetual state of staleness.
And even worse than this is the formula we've made for coming to "know" Christ. All men have sinned. All have fallen short of the glory of God. Jesus was God and was perfect and died for your sins so you could get to Heaven. All you have to do is confess you're a sinner, receive forgiveness....and you make into Heaven! We preach it to others in hope that they'll start living in the "joy" we have too. Yet it's a bunch of crap. While we've gotten so many things right with theology, we've missed the point. Our goal, Christ's goal, was not to "get us into Heaven"; rather it was help us into a right relationship with God. We've made a formula to get into Heaven and we follow it so closely. And it makes a relationship worthless because relationships are hard. Formulas are easy.
We've gotten it wrong; I've gotten it wrong. And I know it. I've known it for a long time. Formulas are easy, relationships are hard. And in so many ways I still live out a formula faith daily. If I do enough or if I lead enough, God will speak to me. If I know enough of the Scriptures or if I have the right thinking about God then he will speak to me. Or if I spend at least three days of the week in "quiet times" God will speak to me. I've lived this way for years, approaching God with formulas. Again, it's not to say any of these things are wrong (God knows I need quiet times to silence my own voice), but with everything in our lives the motives behind our movements are what matter. Do I go through these motions to dive deeper into a relationship with Christ because they are actions that flow freely from a heart that desires intimacy; or am I yet again attempting to earn my way into his grace, hoping to hear a word from the almighty that confirms I am righteously living inside his will? I don't know. But I know two things: a true conversational relationship with God is always harder than a formulaic approach to God, but it is always better.

Paradox of Hearing God

So question number 1 from chapter 1 of Hearing God is: What is the paradox about hearing God?

The paradox that Willard discusses concerning hearing from God has so many parts. On one side of the paradox is the belief held by so many Christians that hearing from God is a vital component of any faith-filled life. We, well so many of us, see how common it is throughout scripture and we firmly desire it to be real in our lives How many times I have cried out to God, longing to hear his voice, to have him communicate to me. We long to hear God. We long to have his truth clearly spoken into our hearts and to know beyond a shadow of a doubt how to walk in his will. Yes, we long to hear from God.

On the other side though is the fact that we don't truly understand God's speaking to us. We don't understand fully how he communicates to us. Many of us have become saddened or even depressed when a leader declares from the pulpit he has heard from God, yet our own lives are void of God's voice. Maybe he hasn't spoken because he knew it would screw us up because, while our desire to hear him is sincere, our understanding of his speaking is not clear. Maybe he has spoken and we did not know it was him. Is it God or my own sub-conscience? Like Gideon, many of us question God even while he stand directly in front of us, speaking to us so clearly. On this side of the paradox also lies our distrust of those who have claimed God spoke to them only to be proven wrong. Hearing from God has been so manipulated by leaders that it has messed with our thinking concerning the matter. We turn away when yet another leader proclaims he has been given a revelation from the Lord, for we know he is a phoney.

This paradox-our desire to hear God and yet our misunderstanding of God's voice- keeps God at bay in our lives. The Lord speaks to us in relationship and his voice takes many forms, but it is only heard and understood while in relationship with him. This paradox serves as a chasm separating us from him. We long to know God, to hear from him, but this confusion only grows the distance between us. And so we give up, retiring to our lives of religion and formulas, still hoping God will speak but fully believing he is silent.

"Why is it that when we speak to God we are said to be praying but when God speaks to us we are said to be schizophrenic?"
-Lily Tomlin

'Hearing God' by Dallas Willard

Okay, so I've finally decided to start blogging again. I know. Crazy. It's been a while since I've written anything significant. So I thought I would start back with some thoughts on the most recent book I've been reading. My mentor, Clay Anderson, handed me a book last Thursday night after dinner at his house called 'Hearing God' by Dallas Willard. First, Willard is a fantastic author and an amazing mind. Second, he is way smarter than I am. I am so thankful that at the end of his chapters he has a number of questions that make you reexamine everything you've just read. So over the next few months I'll be diving into this book and answering the questions on this blog. I don't exactly have the smartest views of these things, but he does make me think; and aren't blogs supposed to be filled with personal opinions anyways? I've been reading the book for almost a week and have read the first chapter three times. I know. Wow. So each day I think I'll post my response to a single question posed by Willard, which means if you're tracking this right, it'll only make it about a chapter a week. So nine weeks of blogging about a single book. Now that's a wow statement.